|
Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching
Instructor: Chi-Fen
Emily Chen
陳其芬
Department of English National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology, Taiwan |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Unit 1. Introduction to Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL)
1.1 What is CALL? 1.4 What Computers Can and Can’t “Do” 1.5 Roles of the Computer in language learning and teaching 1.7 How Computers are used in the Language Class 1.8 Principles of Using CALL Programs in Language Learning and Teaching
Definitions of CALL: - Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) was the expression agreed upon at the 1983 TESOL convention in a meeting of all interested participants. This term is widely used to refer to the area of technology and second language teaching and learning despite the fact that revisions for the term are suggested regularly (Chapelle, 2001, p. 3). - Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) may be defined as the search for and study of applications of the computer in language teaching and learning (Levy, 1997, p.1). - Given the breadth of what may go on in computer-assisted language learning (CALL), a definition of CALL that accommodates its changing nature is any process in which a learner uses a computer and, as a result, improves his or her language (Beatty, 2003, p. 7). - CALL has come to encompass issues of materials design, technologies, pedagogical theories and modes of instruction. Materials for CALL can include those which are purpose-made for language learning and those which adapt existing computer-based materials, video and other materials (Beatty, 2003, pp. 7-8). CALL programs/materials include (from ICT4LT Module 1.4): - CALL-specific software: applications designed to develop and facilitate language learning, such as CD-ROMs, web-based interactive language learning exercises/quizzes (see CD-ROM examples for language learning) - Generic software: applications designed for general purposes, such as word-processors (Word), presentation software (PowerPoint, see an e-book made by students "Many Moons"), and spreadsheet (Excel), that can be used to support language learning (see examples of using Excel for language learning & teaching) *Also see Microsoft Office Online Templates) - Web-based learning programs: online dictionaries, online encyclopedias, online concordancers, news/magazine sites, e-texts, web-quests, web publishing, blog, wiki, etc.
- Computer-mediated
communication (CMC) programs:
synchronous - online chat; asynchronous - email, discussion forum,
message board
1.4 What Computers Can and Can’t “Do” (based on Meskill, 2002, p. 122)
* Caveat: - Computer technology has to be treated as an aid, but not a panacea. - The effectiveness of CALL cannot reside in the technology itself but in how it is put to use and for what purposes.
1.5 Roles of the Computer in language learning and teaching: - computer as tutor for language drills or skill practice - computer as a tool for writing, presenting, and researching - computer as a medium of global communication * Now read Benson's brief CALL history and the roles of the computer.
1.6 The development of CALL – from the pedagogical perspective
I) Warschauer's Analysis (Kern & Warschauer, 2000; Warschauer, 1996; Warschauer, 2004) (*Note: the three stages have not occurred in a rigid sequence. As each new stage has emerged, previous stages continue.)
View of Language: Structural (a formal structural system) English Teaching Paradigm: Grammar-Translation & Audio-lingual Principal Use of Computers: Drill and Practice Principal Objective: Accuracy Characteristics:
View of Language: Cognitive (a mentally constructed system through interaction) English Teaching Paradigm: Communicative Language Teaching Principal Use of Computers: Communicative Exercises (to practice language use; non-drill format) Principal Objective: Fluency Characteristics:
View of Language: Sociocognitive (developed in social interaction through discourse communities) English Teaching Paradigm: Content-based & ESP/EAP Principal Use of Computers: Authentic Discourse (to perform real-life tasks) Principal Objective: Agency (*definition: "the satisfying power to take meaningful action and see the results of our decisions and choices" Murray, 1997, p. 126) Two types: Multimedia CALL (CD-ROMs) and Web-based CALL (on the Internet) A) Multimedia CALL Characteristics:
B) Web-based CALL Characteristics: A) CMC –
B) The Web –
* Question: Do you think Warschauer's analysis of the development of CALL is a good one? Do you see any problems in his analysis? [Read Bax's (2003) or see the quoted passage: Bax's criticism to Warschauer's analysis of the development of CALL]
II) Bax's Analysis (2003)
* Question: Do you think Bax's analysis of the development of CALL is a good one? Do you see any problems in his analysis?
1.7 How Computers can be used in the Language Class
1) Teaching with one computer in the class - delivery of content (PowerPoint, word-processor, Webpages, etc.) - classroom activities/discussions mediated by the computer - Interactive whiteboard
2) Teaching in the computer network room (network-based language teaching) - task-based group work /activities - computer-mediated communication (CMC): asynchronous/synchronous - tandem learning
3) Self-access learning (independent learning) - drills and exercises - word processing - resource searching
4) Distance learning (i.e. individual learners working by themselves, at a place and time of their choice and, to some extent, at a pace and in an order also chosen by themselves.) - delivering online course content - CMC activities: email, discussion forum, chat rooms - tandem learning - community building
1.8 Principles of Using and Designing CALL Programs in Language Learning and Teaching - student/learner-centeredness (to promote learner autonomy) - meaningful purpose - comprehensive input - sufficient level of stimulation (cognitively and affectively) - multiple modalities (to support various learning styles and strategies) - high level of interaction (human-machine and human-human)
1. Sign Up
4. Wait for the approval from the instructor References:
Bax, S. (2003). CALL – past, present and future. System, 31, 13-28. Available: http://www.iateflcompsig.org.uk/media/callpresentpastandfuture.pdf Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. New York: Longman. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge. Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-19). New York: Cambridge University Press. Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer. M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260. Levy, M. (1997) CALL: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Meskill, C. (2002). Teaching and learning in real time: Media, technologies, and language acquisition. Houston, TX: Athelstan. Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International. Available: http://www.gse.uci.edu/faculty/markw/call.html Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71. Available: http://www.gse.uci.edu/faculty/markw/overview.html Warschauer, M. (2004). Technological change and the future of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Brown (Eds.), New Perspectives on CALL for Second and Foreign Language Classrooms (pp. 15-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||